In a study of pregnant women in the United States, Cedars-Sinai investigators found that a specific imbalance of two placental proteins could predict preclampsia risk and the women who were most likely to develop the life-threatening blood pressure disorder.
The study is published in the journal NEJM Evidence.
“We discovered that a blood test measuring the ratio between two proteins involved in blood vessel development in the placenta could identify which of the women would develop preterm preeclampsia with severe features,” says study co-senior author Sarah Kilpatrick, MD, PhD, chair of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Cedars-Sinai. “This test was significantly better than all the standard-of-care markers for preeclampsia with severe features. It predicted with over 90% accuracy whether the patient would develop preeclampsia with severe features or not, while the usual markers were accurate less than 75% of the time.”
The blinded, prospective study of women initially hospitalized for preterm hypertension involved 1,014 patients from18 hospitals across the nation.
“We anticipate that this blood test may eventually lead to better health outcomes for mothers and their babies,” said Kilpatrick. “It is well known that preeclampsia advances in virtually all patients until they give birth. But it can be very hard to predict the optimal time for delivery. Having an accurate test would help us ensure that the mother was in the right hospital for management of her care and that of her preterm baby.”
Investigators found that a specific protein imbalance revealed in blood tests of the hospitalized pregnant women provided a way to quantify their preclampsia risk. It involves levels of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PIGF) in the bloodstream.
“An sFlt-1 to PIGF ratio of 40 or greater predicted the development of serious preeclampsia, adverse outcomes and early delivery within two weeks, two-thirds of the time,” says S. Ananth Karumanchi, MD, the co-senior author of the study and the Medallion Chair in Vascular Biology.
“Conversely, if the critical ratio between the two proteins was below 40, we found the risk that the patient would progress to preeclampsia with severe features within two weeks of the blood test was less than 5%,” says Karumanchi, who is also director of Nephrology at Cedars-Sinai.
Currently, the only cure for preeclampsia is delivery. A test indicating that a preterm patient, a woman who has completed less than 37 weeks of pregnancy, is likely to develop severe disease could help optimize care.
“We anticipate that this blood test may eventually lead to better health outcomes for mothers and their babies,” says Kilpatrick. “It is well known that preeclampsia advances in virtually all patients until they give birth. But it can be very hard to predict the optimal time for delivery. Having an accurate test would help us ensure that the mother was in the right hospital for management of her care and that of her preterm baby.”
Rates of preeclampsia have been steadily on the rise, largely due to increases in obesity and hypertension in the nation. Black, American Indian and Alaska Native women have significantly higher rates of the diseases than white women, and a higher risk of death.
Investigators also hope the findings can point the way to potential drug therapies for women at risk.
“We know sFlt-1 is the protein that goes up even before any symptoms of preeclampsia occur and the ratio of sFlt-1 to PlGF predicts worsening disease,” says Karumanchi. “Further research may identify a drug mechanism that could reduce levels of sFlt-1 and be used to safely prolong pregnancy; that would be a gamechanger for very preterm preeclampsia patients.”
While the study involved a single blood test of two proteins, investigators are encouraged that more research, involving large numbers of subjects, will provide better tools for thwarting preeclampsia risk before it can seriously harm patients and their babies.
“We performed this study to identify a simple, accurate biomarker clinicians can use to determine who is at highest risk for preeclampsia with severe features and who would be an appropriate candidate for treatments that we could develop for this devastating condition,” says study co-senior author Ravi Thadhani, MD, MPH, a professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, chief academic officer at Mass General Brigham, in Boston, Massachusetts, and a visiting faculty scientist at Cedars-Sinai. “I believe we achieved this goal.”
Featured Image: A new Cedars-Sinai study could help identify preclampsia risk in pregnant women. Photo: Getty